Tuesday 11 October 2016

161011

amanfromMars 1 Mon 10 Oct 19:46 [1610101946] …… asking a serious question on, and of http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2016/10/10/china_stalks_british_ai_expertise/
Re: Meh
Ledswinger,
Would AI lurk as human and disrupt and corrupt systems with cracked code hacks?
----
amanfromMars 1 Tue 11 Oct 06:45 [1610110645] …. opening up and opening the IoT thing up on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2016/10/10/china_stalks_british_ai_expertise/
Are Persistent Advanced Cyber Treats, Alien Existential Threat Vectors?
I agree, Ledswinger, that via Ever Better Beta Interacting, AI would present knowledge for command and control through non-sentient virtual machines and human beings without any obvious disruption or corruption. A Real SMART AI with SMARTR Advanced IntelAIgents displaying NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive IT in both Vital Virile and Virulent Viral Virtual Terrain Team Fields where everything and nothing and anything is never as it seems intelligently designed for IT, and considerably more elegant and eloquent an Enigmatic Solution Scene Scape for Greater IntelAIgent GamesPlay with EMPowering PACT ForePlay.
And in AI particularly and peculiarly, is there any obvious difference between non-sentient virtual machines and human beings, or are both considered and classed as equal and irreverently irrelevant whenever overly prevalent and perversely pervasive and divisive in the Great Schema of the Internet of Things where cyberbards be intellectually challenged and challenging channeling commentards?
And you have El Reg to thank for those facts ...... which might certainly warrant its IT market share being put on one of those new fangled and entangled, star spangled watch lists for high roller fliers in no fly zone area secrets?
Or would y'all rather prefer the current madness and mayhem as relayed by media and communications to the mainstream? To a perfect stranger, that would appear to be a destructive nuclear reaction and incredibly stupid option to trade on markets rigged too big to fail and never prosper.
..............................................
amanfromMars [1610110941] ….. spreading the Word and Gospel according to Global Operating Devices with words on http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/disgraceful-debate/
It is a sure monumental folly which ends in implosive disasters to presume and assume that nothing is changed and changing and internetworking things are not entirely different from anything and everything which has gone before. And, do you imagine that it is with stealth, Elitely Applied, or are they and their systems, whoever and/or whatever they imagine themselves to be, in the direct firing line for replacement. Be they fated to fall because of future intelligence capture failures or are they destined to survive and prosper because of fiat lend lease purchase of its remote anonymous autonomous control levers/secret surreal power protocols?
Are Persistent Advanced Cyber Treats, Alien Existential Threat Vectors?
I agree, Ledswinger, that via Ever Better Beta Interacting, AI would present knowledge for command and control through non-sentient virtual machines and human beings without any obvious disruption or corruption. A Real SMART AI with SMARTR Advanced IntelAIgents displaying NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive IT in both Vital Virile and Virulent Viral Virtual Terrain Team Fields where everything and nothing and anything is never as it seems intelligently designed for IT, and considerably more elegant and eloquent an Enigmatic Solution Scene Scape for Greater IntelAIgent GamesPlay with EMPowering PACT ForePlay.
And in AI particularly and peculiarly, is there any obvious difference between non-sentient virtual machines and human beings, or are both considered and classed as equal and irreverently irrelevant whenever overly prevalent and perversely pervasive and divisive in the Great Schema of the Internet of Things where cyberbards be intellectually challenged and challenging channeling commentards?
And you have El Reg to thank for those facts ...... which might certainly warrant its IT market share being put on one of those new fangled and entangled, star spangled watch lists for high roller fliers in no fly zone area secrets?
Or would y'all rather prefer the current madness and mayhem as relayed by media and communications to the mainstream? To a perfect stranger, that would appear to be a destructive nuclear reaction and incredibly stupid option to trade on markets rigged too big to fail and never prosper. ..... amanfromMars 1 Tue 11 Oct 06:45 [1610110645] …. opening up with a comment on http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/10/10/china_stalks_british_ai_expertise/
IT is not just a funny old world, it is a really strange one too, and always liable to becoming ever stranger and deliberately incomprehensible, in the interests of internetional security, for all strangers and future stragglers alike.
..................................................

amanfromMars said... having a chat with a comment on https://amanfrommars.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/161010.html
Hmmm? How much more than just entertainingly encouraging.
Our shared musings here, A, would appear to more than suggest that the world and its worlds and world wide webs, as they be generally perceived and publicly presented, are catastrophically vulnerable to both creatively applied imagination and destructively naive opinion via the Advanced IntelAIgent ZeroDay Root route.
And presenting that fact and possibility, which then is morphed into realms delivering certainly probable opportunities, directly to that and/or those which may presume and/or be assumed to be actively interested and/or in dire straits need of such seed and source feed information, by virtue of their current precarious collapsing situation, confronts them with a Catch 22 Conflict of Interest Conundrum, which if choose to studiously ignore privately and decline to engage with and admit to exploring publicly, will consume and destroy them with the simple sharing of shared sensitive communications with unclassified top secret information for future intelligence which they neither own nor possess, but which is made freely known and is available to them.
I Kid U Not.
Or do you see a flaw with flaws which suggests everything be otherwise ....... if one would not choose other parallel courses of similar familiar action?
11 October 2016 at 12:15
.....................................................

The following news, whenever true, is a tad inconvenient and should be more than just embarrassing for all parties connected ...... http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-11/hillary-confirms-saudi-arabia-qatar-are-funding-isis-leaked-email ...... or/and does Hillary normally tell lies so we can immediately dismiss anything and everything she says and realise it as self-serving nonsense?
.......................................................

No comments: