Sunday, 26 November 2017

171126

amanfromMars Nov 26, 2017 5:20 AM [1711261020] .... airing a clear view on http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-25/he-cant-accept-fact-he-screwed-special-counsel-muellers-surprisingly-flawed-past
the US intelligence community has the most expansive, most sophisticated and most intrusive surveillance network in the history of human civilization.
That is as may be, however the US intelligence community is not the smartest of communities and fails spectacularly to both more and most effectively use the information and intelligence that they glean/purloin/steal/phish and phorm for future stability rather than current modi operandi/vivendi, the presentation of more conflict and chaos/madness and mayhem.

J'accuse. The evidence is overwhelming.

..................................................

amanfromMars 1 Sun 26 Nov 16:25 [1711261656] .....airing a thought on https://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/2/2017/11/22/google_oracle_location_privacy/

Re: Google is the retail arm of the NSA @Yet Another Anonymous coward
There is no conflict of interest: What's good for Google is good for America ... Yet Another Anonymous coward
The problem that plagues America though, is that Google is Lacking Performance/Super Application of Learned Knowledge.

That is one black hole of a systemic vulnerability for colossal exploitation resulting in further expansion and capitalisation of ...... well, such as would be classed and traded as New and/or NEUKlearer HyperRadioProACTive IT Product.

Uncle Sam could then turn himself inside out comparing/confessing/confusing/professing it to be an Almighty FSB Program.

.............................................

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

...and this is it, amanfromMars. you're doing very fine, as one can c.

that's what doesn't allow GOOG kinds make decisions without their television, e.g. the independent ones.a Pseudo-Parasite InfraChaotic Emission of Bytes that can Bite those who see Jaws in IT.

but there's no way to monetize it/IT in this circle of L.O.V.E, except a little charity fountation?

otherwise, what should people in business say to their accountants? "Guys, we're investing in the future which we can't order by ourselves"?

but that's the very point that they exactly can, being just Regd or, say, DB commentors/respondents/amfM service correspondents (-;

Anonymous said...

was in such a hurry that've forgot to say Hi.

/norobot#

should be a green one in the check box :-)