amanfromMars 1 Tue 22 Sep 06:21 [2609220621] ..... points out an hypocisy/hallucination on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2026/09/21/202619/
How to Provide a Schrödinger Cat Dilemma with a Load of Paradoxical Bollocks
The US appears to be inching ever so slowly toward holding AI executives legally liable for their models’ criminal activities.
And now more fully knowing the dangers of using AI .... a possibility of AIgents going rogue and entertaining criminal activities ........ is the US Government and Presidency legally liable for conflict and damage caused by their following of AI models' instructions/direction in any of their myriad diverse executive administrative office and militarised weapons systems ?????
You can't have your cake and eat it until quantum superposition is no longer a thing ?????
----
amanfromMars 1 Tue 22 Sep 07:05 [2609220705] ..... adds on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2026/09/21/202619/
Re: How to Provide a Schrödinger Cat Dilemma with a Load of Paradoxical Bollocks
Former FTC chair Lina Khan's comments reported by El Reg's Brandon Vigliarolo in his article on how uncomfortable it might be to be an AI CEO ....... https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/09/14/ex-ftc-boss-khan-urges-uncle-sam-to-break-out-the-handcuffs-for-ai-ceos-citing-1934-precedent/5296325 ..... more than just suggests government and military leadership use of AI leaves them similarly vulnerable to personal and criminal liability for decisions and ordered activity directly or indirectly resulting from the entertaining of any input/output/analysis from LLMs/AIMachines.
----
amanfromMars 1 Tue 22 Sep 17:18 [2609221718] ...... points out a systemic flaw on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2026/09/21/202619/
Who gives a Hoot whenever Leading Systems are Ripe Rotten to the Core
We won't know for sure until case law has been settled, but generally speaking you are already criminally liable if you do something you know to be extremely dangerous and someone else is injured or suffers financial lose, even if you didn't intend to hurt anyone. ..... RM Myers
Being criminally liable is one thing but being prosecuted or persecuted and suffering exemplary punishment for it is quite another thing altogether and the latter does not necessarily always follow the former. Indeed, in many cases, there appears to be the easy availability of a very handy immunity from prosecution and escape from any sort of punitive sanction.
Sending a nation to war against an adversary on the false premise of their possession of weapons of mass destruction and chemical and biological weapons able to be deployed within 45 minutes is most dangerous, injured and/or killed tens or even hundreds of thousands with a financial cost in the many ten or even hundreds of billions ........ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/issues/4481139.stm ..... and what happened to the perps directly responsible for all of that?
...................................