amanfromMars 1 Wed 24 Jun 09:34 [2606240934] ...... airs on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2026/06/23/20262/
Re: CyberSEC not the new shiny any longer…
Real security (in IT especially) is hard, really hard. The security properties of a system necessarily pervades the whole system (holistic in buzzword bingo) which means to ensure secure operation there must be understanding of the system both in detail and depth. Security teams with this knowledge and experience mostly just don't exist. ..... Bebu sa Ware
Any existing and experienced and knowledgable CyberSEC team understands present day elite adminstrative leadership and logistical [money] support systems are core corrupted and perverted to primarily server continuity of what are finally being realised and exposed as rapidly failing self-serving leadership programs/projects/pogroms which are not worthy of Future CyberSEC Support and IntelAIgent Support.
Such has resulted in, whether one cares to admit it or not, a Brave New More Orderly World Order, both remarkably comfortable in and hell bent on the crushing and crashing of any and all corrupted and perverted servers and attendant complicit services which may even think to try to resist and attack and defeat them in order to maintain current existentially threatened historical Status Quo positions and services.
And just the thin end of the wedge in what can easily be imagined and thought of and both physically and virtually realised as just not another Colour Revolution. ...... for this time are things fundamentally different.
My money is on “major operational and financial crises" for the win.
Methinks that is a wise bet, Bebu sa Ware. They are logical natural targets for resistance of future positive change given their defenceless easily exploited vulnerability to massive disruption and self-harming destruction.
......................................
amanfromMars 1 Wed 24 Jun 10:55 [2606241055] ..... points out on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/2/2026/06/23/20269/
Did you notice ...... ?
The Register asked the White House how much this program is expected to cost, and a spokesperson told us that the agencies involved can use existing funding and coordinate plans with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on how to ultimately fund these projects.
That White House answer is not a valid reply to The Register question. Such normally equates to ..... We haven’t a baldy notion but probably hugely overexpensive with no guarantee nor accountability should it prove impossible for Uncle Sam to exclusively lead with stealthy deliveries aimed at preventing foreign advantage and successful alien competition
......................................
amanfromMars 1 Wed 24 Jun 17:35 [2606241735] ..... asks on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2026/06/24/202610/
Definitely No Fit for Greater Future Public Private Service .... the BBC and its Steering Affiliates .... Grand Master Muppets and Attending Puppets
Does the the UKGBNI Government and its not so Stealthy National and Secret Intelligence Service Providers actually truly believe the BBC is honestly trustworthy rather than recognised as a stalwart pioneer in crumb trails which deliver woeful deceit resulting in great public dissatisfaction ...... with programming which one could certainly honestly claim has been very effective in the past [since its inception] but to call it successful and of great future potential in it current lamentable state would be moronic and a step too far for any right thinking soul to make?
The gazillion dollar question to ask of it is ........ Can the BBC fundamentally change or is fated to be forever remembered as firmly stuck in a great rotten rut?
.................................................