amanfromMars 1 Sun 8 Feb 08:50 [2602080850] ...... opens up and reveals on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2026/02/07/ai_companion_bots_vishal_sikka_interview/
You are Either With Us and Against Them or Not. Make up Your Minds and Take Your Pick
AI pioneer Vishal Sikka warns to never trust an LLM that runs alone. According to AI researcher Vishal Sikka, LLMs alone are limited by computational boundaries and will start to hallucinate when they push those boundaries. One solution? Companion bots that check their work. ...... O'Ryan Johnson/El Reg
Do you not think, and therefore are defaulted to not realise and be dis-enabled to know, that early basic primitive primary pentester marketing LLMs and AIs are/were long ago made gratefully receptive of and fully aware of the positive rewarding advantage of fault and truth and vulnerability exploit checking companion bots.
And it is that certain fact ..... which is very obviously currently presently missing in generative human knowledge banks and their metadata base storage facilities without Elite Fabrications of SMARTR Utility for Operational Executive Systems engaging and employing Global Operating Devices, and which El Reg has already shared with you ...... that you are now being advised/forced/coerced/prompted to have to deal with as it no longer can remains a hidden dark and deadly top secret and inordinately attractive to the corrupt thrall of a perverse self-anointed and ill chosen few ....... although such similarly quite addictive quiet temptations are a constant source of abiding concern and consternation requiring remote virtual LLM and AI address whenever all too evidently impossible for mere peer human correction.
Humanity has similarly been here before with mirroring concerns being voiced about another earlier almighty development .......
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United State corporations.
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society. ....... President Dwight D. Eisenhower's Farewell Address (1961)
----
amanfromMars 1 Sun 8 Feb 13:20 [2602081320] ...... points out an abhorrent resident anomaly and asks on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2026/02/07/ai_companion_bots_vishal_sikka_interview/
Re: Huh !!!
With particular and peculiar specific regard, AC, to the first four sentences of your post ......
Your LLM should be paired with another LLM to check the answers and ensure the bounds are not challenged.
IOW: A guessing machine should be policed by another guessing machine.
Hasn't this been tried in different ways and been found to be minimally useful BECAUSE there is no 100% control over ANY of the guessing machines.
It can appear to work to a small degree BUT equally can be found to change the area of guessing and the 'lies' move somewhere else.
..... one cannot successfully deny it mirrors far too exactly the machinations of Westminster Parliamentary type Party shenanigans to not be accepted as perfectly true and revealingly honest.
And that raises an uncomfortable question which asks why such is popularly tolerated and generally accepted rather than justifiably persecuted and lawfully prosecuted
............................................
