amanfromMars 1 Thu 5 Dec 05:54 [2412050554] ...... airs on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2024/12/04/amazon_leans_into_ai/
Well he/it/they/she would, wouldn't he/it/they/she ... say that à la MRDA
A new dawn of humanity? .... Alan Bourke
Yes, Alan Bourke, it is ..... but whilst for a Few A.N.Others such is easily extremely exciting and tremendously rewarding, you may like to ask yourself why it is for so many others proving itself to be so very troubling and maddening and impossible to accept and digest as an approved fact rather than treating it as an absolutely fabulous fantastical fabless fiction.
Despite all the hullaballoo about "generative antagonistic network artificial intelligence/machine learning", doing this and revolutionising that, it has a single killer app which guarantees GAN AI/ML will be around forever.
That app is the creation of pr0n. .... An_Old_Dog
It is a grave mistake and huge vulnerability which can and is and will always be relentlessly exploited to the nth degree, to believe the guarantee that GAN AI/ML will be around forever is ensured and secured by a single killer app ..... such as may be the creation of pr0n ..... whenever there is a vast store of many others of equal or greater worth and value to field as and when required and thought suitable.
............................
amanfromMars 1 Thu 5 Dec 09:10 [2412050910] ....... shares on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2024/12/05/tmobile_cso_telecom_attack/
Some things may be impossible to be fixed by humans and therefore foreign help be needed. ...... or would anything like that be considered and feared as far too much like an Alien Attack to be recognised and accepted as something quite different
They have extremely sophisticated capabilities, zero-day vulnerabilities that we don't even know exist,..
Ah, yes ...... some of those "unknown unknowns — the ones we don’t know we don’t know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tends to be the difficult ones" ..... US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld advised everyone about and which should also be as gravely regarded as that which President Dwight D.Eisenhower's Farewell Address warned everyone about almost 64 years ago but which is still something yet to be successfully addressed and universally remedied to halt it preying on the public like a parasite hosting a pandemic virus .....
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.
Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United State corporations.
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.
.......................................
amanfromMars 1 Thu 5 Dec 17:40 [2412051740] ..... suggests on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2024/12/05/mlcommons_ai_safety_benchmark/
Is it any more difficult than Dan Dare like rocket science?
"To get here [a highly reliable, low risk service] for AI, we need standard AI safety benchmarks." .... Peter Mattson, founder and president of MLCommons
Any advance on guaranteed failsafe steps and solutions? That’s where all the SMARTR money will be going. .......SMARTR Mentoring Analysis Reporting TitanICQ Research or, as things progress into the more interesting and discerning of novel and noble fields, as they most certainly have and will always do ..... SMARTR Mentoring Analysis Researching TitanICQ Reports and/or their Reporters.
Who Dares Win Wins Virtual Team Terrain in AI Territory.
......................................
