260403

 amanfromMars 1 Fri 3 Apr 07:06 [2604030706] ....... shares out loud on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2026/04/01/live_and_let_ai_excia/

Re: "Humans won't just be necessary for intelligence work"?

No and yes are the answers to those two questions you have asked, AC .... "Is it just me or is that a very weird-sounding sentence?"

Would it sound equally weird, and be of itself even weirder, but also be much wiser to be prepared for a very different and surprisingly novel and strange ennobled future, to think that AIMachinery might rather autocorrect what one may say and in so doing share insights into the darker sides of its analytical processes which will result in likely autonomous executive action[s] that can easily directly threaten the course of human existence, because if IT were to state ....... “Humans just won't be necessary for intelligence work” rather than “Humans won't just be necessary for intelligence work” .......... is that a Quantum Communications Leap into a vast new series of Brave NEUKlearer HyperRadioProACTive Neurolinguistically Reprogrammable Worlds in which one can both be Enabled to Embrace and Enjoy, and Work, Rest and Play in.

...............................................