Monday, 29 July 2013

130729


amanfromMarsJuly 29, 2013 at 6:26 AM … commenting on PRISMs on http://electrospaces.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/nsa-says-there-are-three-different.html
Of course, P/K, what is understandably missing from the PRISM planning tool slide, indicating use by the various military commands.…. [https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxx7XX732cUX-gHqJFo_1MaI6izAcyCEBeX9aP0kzh_f8pEVKZWjpcteMUkyo_XNnOdpPB-B-cKBweeujLuXbO0A9BG46sEUUaAmhXc5le5XTPIhyhnVgseaF_0g8gD3X9cbYrMdNRDF0/s1600/prism-different.jpg] … for every valid reason that can be thought of/dreamt up in national security/international and Internetional relations/individual personal security circles, are the following subsequent stages after the Information Flow into Analysing and Production Units and which are responsible for ….. well, nothing less than Future Tasks and Live Virtual Machine Quests for Applied Intelligence Missions in CHAOS …. Clouds Hosting Advanced Operating Systems ….. which you might like to consider and imagine are akin to, but at much higher levels of exclusive executive administration and in completely different field environments, Virtual Mission Operations Centers.
And such are always going to be Code Black MkUltraSensitive and made strictly available on Prime Need to Know bases, and be way above and much better secured and deeper protected against intrusion and disruption/phishing and deforming, than Top Secret/SCI.
..........................................................................
amanfromMars • July 28, 2013 11:57 PM …. commenting on http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/07/michael_hayden.html
Hi, Bruce,
What are we to imagine BT does with the information which flows through their ISP to customers. Or are we to be led to believe that virtual security bods and real live time boffins batting and battling for British Telecom are not into snooping and analysing flows of information for future business requirements/global opportunities and for possible irregular and unconventional activity which might be harmful and disruptive and destructive, rather than creatively constructive and novel?
Methinks, marking their scorecard and remarking on their performance, they need to do significantly better in the field, for they be leading nothing to anywhere anyone would be wishing to follow, and as be evidenced by all current news channels and media outlets.
......................................................................................................

No comments: