amanfromMars 1 Fri 4 Mar 09:00 [2203040900] ........ asks on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2022/03/03/telco_security_regulations_dcms_consultation/
Re: STASI....Plausible Deniability.....welcome to 1984 and 2022!!!
Quote: "....the British government has quietly dropped a requirement for mass surveillance of UK internet users ...."
....looks like a lie to me!! I suppose if it's true, then they are about to shutter Cheltenham and make thousands of snoops redundant!!
Then again, if it really is a lie, what does it actually mean? Probably that "mass surveillance" is on going...but "plausible deniability" has now kicked in big time!!!
Welcome to STASI 2022!!!! .....mbiggs
It does have one wondering and pondering on who the British government and Cheltenham think they are working for if they need to spy on every man and his dog ..... presumably to protect themselves from opposition or competition from the practically unknown amongst the unregistered masses, a permissible action which is not forthcoming from fellow members of pathetic official Parliamentary opposition parties?
It is certainly not anyone/anything increasing health and wealth for the nation whenever the exact opposite is so evidently true.
Such is either the present perverse masterplan or key players are totally incompetent and corrupt ..... or a fused quantum amalgam of both despicable possibilities.
Is there nobody advising/showing them what to do, and what can be so easily done, with all these new fangled and entangling virtual tools at everyone’s disposal to halt and reverse the diabolical decline and destroy and root out the rot to its very core ‽ .
.................................
amanfromMars
March 3, 2022 at 16:52 [2203031652] ....... asks on https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2022/03/the-universal-boosting-of-putin/
Do you think any Russian billionaire oligarchs who have been enriching British society and Parliamentary political party members for some considerable time now, if you can believe what is spouted as news now and shenanigans to be stopped and investigated, will take kindly to being suddenly summarily robbed of their accumulated wealth and deprived of their illiquid assets? Or do you think they will contemplate arranging for appropriate personalised revenge to be exacted upon those with a leading responsibility and thoroughly worthy of the sanction?
No comments:
Post a Comment