Thursday, 21 October 2010

101021

If you worry about being just a number, how do you feel about being a Machine for ProgramMING?

Posted Thursday 21st October 2010 02:43 GMT

"Of course, all of the above assumes that any government agency is capable of running such a large project without fucking it up. Then again, GCHQ already have plenty of experience of using big iron to do SIGINT, so if anyone can, it's probably them." ..... The Other Steve Posted Wednesday 20th October 2010 22:12 GMT

I wonder whether GCHQ has a Virtual Terrain Team programming Cyber Certainty into the Cyber Security Office Machine ..... for a Greater Order into Vanquishing Chaos with Virgin Intellectual Projects and dDutch Initiative in a Sublime Joint Turing Adventure?

And if not, why not, whenever it is available? Whose Narrative and Agenda are they Servering with the Cheltenham Machine Node.

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2010/10/20/imp_coalition/
....................................................................................................................................................................

The Naked Truth is that Most have No Idea what they are Missing in Denial of Pleasure's Treasure

Posted Thursday 21st October 2010 07:09 GMT

Whom do porn stars confuse when all are beautifully satisfied and contented with performance?

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2010/10/20/travellers_to_declare_illegal_pornography_at_oz_border/
..........................................................................................................................................................................
amanfromMars
21 October 2010 at 9:41 am

he said: “Absolutely, our client made a very explicit defence in his statement in the crown court which set out his contention that he had been the victim of a state agent who had specifically framed him for the offence for which he was charged.”

How inconvenient when true for it could spill a great deal of sensitive code in need of Beta Protection.

http://sluggerotoole.com/2010/10/20/we-are-raising-this-case-now-with-david-ford-justice-minister-mr-chris-smith-us-congress-the-irish-government-all-interested-non-governmental-offices-and-civil-liberties-organisations-local-poli/
.....................................................................................................................................................................

Posted by AmanfromMars on 10/21/2010 2:26:48 AM

China's Root Policy appears to be one of Leadership with Enlightened Meritocracy in Control of Function and Utility.

Bravo China. With IT Control, is it a Shining Path with Peace.

http://thedailybell.com/1460/The-West-Implodes.html
.....................................................................................................................................................................
amanfromMars
21 October 2010 at 7:56 am

UTV’s Political Editor Ken Reid says Downing Street wants NI Secretary Owen Paterson to be the point of contact. [added emphasis]

If Downing Street want to play it that way, then surely the NI Secretary should OFDFM Executive Choice. Or is that too much like a mole in dodgy government?

http://sluggerotoole.com/2010/10/15/however-we-cant-invite-ourselves/
.....................................................................................................................................................................

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why would anyone (anyone sane) draw so much attention to themselves?

Will you delete this post also?

A list of such government keywords: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/31/what_are_those_words/

I can't wait to hear your reply.
I noticed you deleted my post from page: http://amanfrommars.blogspot.com/2010/10/101009.html

It was regarding the comment from some lame would be cyber terrorist saying: "I guess I got my mojo back, so I understand what you are doing again, and why you are so cryptic. I look forward to your help in making a Masterpiece. You can now count on me, as long as it is a "paint by numbers" masterpiece."

I am sure it was a mistake, right?

From what I understand, anyone frequenting this blog would be subject to investigation. This is based off the content, and would especially apply if the person viewing the blog was inside the United States.

What is your motivation for posting such content?

The truth will set you free.
brainsetcgmail.com

amanfromMars said...

Anonymous,

If you post something and it doesn't appear will the problem be that the blog filter tags you as spam.

"What is your motivation for posting such content?"

The truth will set you free.

Anonymous said...

Well as you can see here: tinyurl.com/33fvztn

It sure looks like it would be hard to make it look as spam.

The post was not spammy, and you get time to review each post if it is marked spam to verify, verify, verify that it is such content.

But enough about spam, this posting was not about spam.

My real question was: What is your real motivation for the content posted inside this blog.

What's up with all the keywords embedded inside your website?

Addresses of security agencies, specific targeted agency keywords, critical infrastructure keywords, even links to forms for requesting payment for services from places like M(I)5.

And was that even a bank account number I noticed posted one day on amanfrommars.baywords.com ?

I am sure I have to be mistaken.
Right?

amanfromMars said...

"My real question was: What is your real motivation for the content posted inside this blog."

Well, do you think change you can believe in is something which just happens all by itself, or would it need a helping hand or three? And this says more that just a little about what is being embedded into systems ...... http://amanfrommars.baywords.com/about/ ..... and would test defence and security protocols/parameters for holes and vulnerabilities which can be easily exploited for fabulous gain.

"And was that even a bank account number I noticed posted one day on amanfrommars.baywords.com ?

I am sure I have to be mistaken.
Right?"


No. You are right.