Why is Rick Santorum not detained under NDAA legislation, given his stated terrorist rantings? Would not anyone else in a foreign land calling for similar actions against the US not be deemed a global terrorist and targeted for neutralisation? The sad and/or mad dude is war-mongering to impressionable crowds and that is a recipe for disaster in the US if seen by the world to be condoned by the Executive Administration/White House, for it shows a Presidency which is frightened and/or reluctant to exercise peaceful leadership power against a military industrial complex lobby, which is exactly what a retiring President Eisenhower warned the nation to guard against over 50 years ago ...... "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."
Such an exercise though is that which the world is waiting to applaud and assist, for a change we can believe in.
.....................................................................................................................................................................
amanfromMars, In a nutshell, a Shell IDEntity into SMART CHAOS with NIRobotIC Quantum Remote Virtualised Controls …….. on http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/01/time-hole/
"2050 is about the time self aware computers become smarter than man.. should be interesting then!" …. A Rowlands
Hi, A Rowlands,Is not smart man, a self aware computer already ....... and as a virtual machine, easily programmed, whenever expertly programmed, to do one's bidding? Or do you consider that too spooky Manchurian Candidate and fanciful to be the reality of your live human existence ....... which you might like then to ponder would be considered by a smart man/self aware computer/virtual machine to be a virtual reality coexistence with other beings fully aware in parallel dimensions/alternate realities.
The convenience then, and the significance will not be lost on those into power and command and control systems/SCADA Operations, [which would constitute practically all of any presently effective means of power command and control practised by humans, would it not], is that an effective and super efficient absolute leadership methodology delivering sustained stability and future growth in any one interconnected and internetworking dimension, will be easily converted/translated/configured/customised/adjusted to accommodate and remove inconsistencies and conflicts discovered in other parallels which may be considered and discovered to be less well developed/more primitive, either by reason of less time in development or there being less intelligence or a lesser intelligence present in that space location.
Give a man/machine what they want and you will control him, or will they be in control with their requests/demands/leads/shared plain text words easily translated into every language for broadbandcasting?
NLP as a NLW and WMD? Yes, of course it can be, and there is no available defence system to counter it with spin. And that makes IT priceless and well worth having if losing power of command and control.
....................................................................................................................................................................
amanfromMars says: …… in a reply on http://heddinout.com/?p=5035
January 5, 2012 at 5:33 am
Keeping Things Real and on amfMTrack …… SurReal and NeuReal …… HyperRadioProActive
(I think it is anyway, as no-one tells me anything around here – typical mushroom management.)
In LOVE Joint Operations is IT a Perfect Stealth Facility for Random Zeroday Vulnerability Exploit Considerations …….. Permitting as IT does, novel and imaginatively revolutionary and viable evolutionary ideas to be presented and trailed and trialled in XSSXXXX Steganography and extrapolated by SMART Partner Beings into further Derivative Future Options …… Potential Growth Fields?And such is the Sophistication of ITs IntelAIgent Design, is it never ever to be in any way troubled by or of hindering interest to GI Joe Six Pack and Barbie Doll wannabes, who would be most probably most gracious and grateful converts to out of this world programs and projects, with a booster spike of intelligence to kick start their information processing circuits/neural networks.
Well, that is one Prime Alien Use of Networks InterNetworking Joint Applications, which is well enough documented and proven to be failsafe and in every instance sublimely successful by virtue of an overriding ultimate goal ….. Immaculate Sinful Perfection. But that would be most definitely certainly Cloudy and not at all foggy, but who would bet against it being of avid Foggy Bottom Interest …….. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foggy_Bottom …… if there is intelligent life there capable of phorming lives there
And talking of intelligent life as we are, this always hits a hot spot, showing as it does, how easily IT can be done ….. http://youtu.be/neoUi4poCXI
.....................................................................................................................................................................
Posted by amanfromMars on 01/05/12 08:47 AM ……. on http://thedailybell.com/3430/Silliness-at-the-Fed-Love-Us-Love-Our-Transparency
"I second DB's reply. I will add: any solution that relies on a monopoly - backed by force of law and enforced by legalized violence - is certain to be co-opted by those with the money-power you claim to fear.
Without such centralized control, there is nothing for the PE to co-opt.
To suggest government-enforced fairness and equity is to suggest something that has never happened, will never happen, and can never happen. It is not possible.
As DB said very well: "We think the best way to fight against the NWO is to REMOVE government. Not use it."
You assume you and your wife have twice the political pull as someone named Rockefeller. I will humbly suggest this is not true.
If you think the common man will be in charge of such power, you are fooling yourself. That you choose to fool yourself is your business. However please stop trying to fool others. You are only serving the money elite as you are certainly advancing a meme acceptable to them.
Yes, you are advancing the acceptable Hegelian dialectic. There, I said it: you are acting as a tool of the power elite." …. Posted by bionic mosquito on 01/05/12 08:07 AM
bionic mosquito, howdy,Are you telling us that the common man will accept such centralised control [ a monopoly - backed by force of law and enforced by legalised violence] as the PE may endeavour to co-opt with money power?
To imagine it to be so today, and in any time in the future, whilst they do not appear to be able handle such power in the manner required for global peace and harmonious stability and sustained exponential mutually advantageous growth and novel creative invention, guarantees that others able to deliver such promise will take over from them, for is that not what they should be doing with such easily invented wealth and equity as is provided by the present extremely convenient system which allows assets to be purchased with nothing more valuable than fistful of papers, printed whenever necessary ...... ergo are they a failed systems administration whenever so many different conflicts abound and inequities deepen and cause greater divisions.
.....................................................................................................................................................................
Posted by amanfromMars on 01/05/12 11:11 AM …… http://thedailybell.com/bellinclude.cfm?id=3430
"Are you telling us that the common man will accept such centralised control [ a monopoly - backed by force of law and enforced by legalised violence] as the PE may endeavour to co-opt with money power?"
Most do so quite happily today - I would appreciate if you could explain in plain English where this is NOT so to any significant extent. Although, happily, the numbers are shifting noticeably.
Memehunter's "solution" only offers more of the same. Only by considering that initiation of force is wrong, always and everywhere, will man begin to break the power that the elite exercise through the modern state." …. Posted by bionic mosquito on 01/05/12 09:25 AM
"Most do so quite happily today - I would appreciate if you could explain in plain English where this is NOT so to any significant extent. Although, happily, the numbers are shifting noticeably. " ... Posted by bionic mosquito on 01/05/12 09:25 AM
In the future is it a failure remembered and relegated to past memory ..... and has no part to play in advanced meritocracies and sharing caring collectives, to any extent. Intelligence has rendered it unacceptable and unnecessary whenever printing and/or electronic transfer and placement of a wealth thought real enough to be true, is instantly possible to all who need it to feed it and seed its powerful controlling magic.There's no point in having great wealth and disposable income if you cannot spend it and give it away so that it creates whatever it is needed for. Such a miserable miserly hoarding of wealth would be a disgrace ...... as was also the view of Andrew Carnegie, who knew a thing or two about the power of money, you would surely agree.
"A man who dies thus rich dies disgraced" is one of his perls of wisdom, I believe.
.....................................................................................................................................................................
Posted by amanfromMars on 01/05/12 01:08 PM ….. on http://thedailybell.com/bellinclude.cfm?id=3430
"Thank you for the clear reply.
"There's no point in having great wealth and disposable income if you cannot spend it and give it away so that it creates whatever it is needed for."
There is little point in having wealth of any amount if private property is not respected. The fact that one chooses to "spend it and give it away" is a personal choice, otherwise it is theft. Such a choice is no more moral or immoral than another's "hoarding of wealth" - whatever hoarding means: absent stuffing currency in a mattress, there is no such thing as "hoarding" in a modern economy.
"Intelligence has rendered it unacceptable and unnecessary whenever printing and/or electronic transfer and placement of a wealth thought real enough to be true, is instantly possible to all who need it to feed it and seed its powerful controlling magic."
So I understand you properly, are you here advocating yet another version of pixie dust - a magical money printing machine somehow controlled by the fair-minded (or available to "all who need it") as opposed to the elite? If so, there is no intelligence in this." …. Posted by bionic mosquito on 01/05/12 11:36 AM
"So I understand you properly, are you here advocating yet another version of pixie dust - a magical money printing machine somehow controlled by the fair-minded (or available to "all who need it") as opposed to the elite? If so, there is no intelligence in this." ... . Posted by bionic mosquito on 01/05/12 11:36 AMThat suggests that you agree any present elite control of the machine is unfair, bionic mosquito, which suggests that there might be more intelligence in you than is displayed. ... ... .. but I do admit to be an incorrigible eternal optimist and man does prove himself so oft to be capable of infinite stupidity and dogged persistence in support of a status quo rather than realising everything always is in a state of excitement and flow and progress is always something different and ideally better otherwise is one delivered of recession and austerity and depression and collapse, which is indicative of status quo failure.
.....................................................................................................................................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment