151118

amanfromMars 1 Tue 17 Nov 18:00 .. asking a vital question on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/2/2015/11/17/osborne_cybersecurity_announcement_isil_gchq/

Avoiding Collateral Damage Demands Accurate Targeting for Maximum Strategic Effect

Do the likes of a pontificating Cameron and Osborne and May and Hammond etc etc realise that they paint an indelible bullseye upon themselves and supporting Parliamentarians for IS sleeper terrorists to critically aim at, and that will last forever too, given the nature of the beast?

Or do governments think themselves immune and lifelong protected from crazy forces and enraged sources of madness and mayhem?

----

amanfromMars 1 Tue 17 Nov 20:52 [1511172052] …… crazy but not mad and growing bolder by the zeroday and appearing on El Reg too …… http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/2/2015/11/17/osborne_cybersecurity_announcement_isil_gchq/

The Enemy Within and in Need of Worlds at War to Stave of Economic Collapse/Ponzi Markets Meltdown?

Here be a contrary view that disagrees fundamentally with radicalising chancellors of dodgy exchequers with austere remote programs to promote and mediate......... http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-17/theres-no-such-thing-isis-journalist-destroys-wests-terror-narrative-warns-crackdown

......................................................