Thursday, 5 November 2015


amanfromMars 1 Wed 4 Nov 20:20 [1511042020] …. having a say on
GCHQ Replies Truthfully .....
It is neither really intelligent nor virtually smart for any party/organisation to allow, or for anyone to think one is somehow allowed especial and exclusive protection and/or exemption from comprehensive surveillance, in these days of ways and means and memes of right dodgy deals and perverse and corrupt practices.
Therefore will any and all services which supply intelligence and provide security ignore such a nonsense and waste no time or effort at all in even thinking to debate and elaborate further on the matter.
Such an exclusion for any sector or vector of opinion will always be fully abused to create all manner of unpleasantnesses.
amanfromMars 1 Thu 5 Nov 03:57 [1511050357] … asking a few more questions of Intelligence Communities on
You know when someones lying whenever the truth is not shared
Well, JassMan, what ever do you expect? It's all smoke and mirrors and obscure obfuscation in spookdom, is it not, and whenever nothing is as it seems, is everything different and a surprise to uncover and discover, and with IT in Creative Command and Cyberspace Control with Computers and Communications, is it a Brave New Orderly World Order Play for Dummies if one doesn't have the Constructive Force and Destructive Power to both Secure Secret Anonymous Supply and Protect Vast Autonomous Delivery of Alternative Virtual Reality Programs ....... Sublime and Seductive Alien Product to Code XSSXXXX Standards.
Is that what Sovereign Defence of the Realm and Nations via a Variety of Proxy Networks is/are doing nowadays in these days with zerodays to exploit with vulnerabilities, GCHQ?
And what say you, Duncan? Certainly more than just likely and probable, or quite an IMPossible Mission for Certifiable Intelligence Agencies to Complete to Compete ?
amanfromMars 1 Thu 5 Nov 14:20 [1511051420] ….. saying more on
Re: You know when someones lying whenever the truth is not shared
And the latter half of this earlier post …… …. asks the same questions of supposed Secretive and Special Intelligence Services as the ones above, and in so doing proves that necessary future better beta intelligence to rule and reign quite differently, and successfully without mounting deficits, is still missing from those organisations and companies/deluded individuals presuming to be leaders in the Great Game and Greater IntelAIgent Games Fields.


Casey Evans said...

RE:"GCHQ Replies Truthfully ....."

I agree that mass surveillance is justified. Not only that it can be of good use to innocent people.

The problem you need to fix is the denial of the evidence collected to be used in court.
Right now they swear up and down that they do not have such information, or that it cannot be used in court because of its classification.

Fix that problem and you will make my day.

amanfromMars said...

The problem with that problem being solved, Casey E, is that collection is on a novel objective subject proposed and led by a self-serving subjective executive, and whenever that is more evident is it realised to be subversive and oppressive and a facility to be resisted and crushed?

Or would that sticky problem for solving be more an abiding opportunity for exploiting?