12 Feb, 2012 - 7:43 am
Methinks y'all need to reconsider what you are likely definitely facing, and certainly hereby confronted with …. and decide upon which fence you want to sit should you be powerless and impotent to act on your own volition/without third party initiative and novel noble leadership, which is just the same as admitting to yourself that you are nowhere near smart enough to think in a new effective way of getting things done differently for a better, positively reinforcing, mutually beneficial advantage which can be shared and delivered to all. Fortunately though would there be others who are not at all petrified by circumstance and so intimidated into such as would be an apathetic and pathetic submission, which appears to be wholly reliant on one remaining in abject ignorance of one's true condition.
This has just been posted elsewhere, and highlights the sort of issues you are challenged to deny exist.
HonourableMember …… asking impertinent pertinent questions on http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/feb/12/black-scholes-equation-credit-crunch
12 February 2012 6:16AM
The winners get their profit from the losers. In any given year, between 75% and 90% of all options traders lose money. The world's banks lost hundreds of billions when the sub-prime mortgage bubble burst. In the ensuing panic, taxpayers were forced to pick up the bill, but that was politics, not mathematical economics.
And when taxpayers refuse to honour a bill which is not theirs to pay, but which politicians thought they could force them to pick up? What future then for a crooked rigged formulaic system and politicians fronting a catastrophically failing Global Dynamic Ponzi whenever their safe business stewardship credibility and intelligence is evidenced as being a fabulous fraud and exploded myth?
.......................................................................................................................................................................AmanfromMars …… on http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2012/02/the-mystery-of-quantitive-easing/
12 Feb, 2012 - 12:27 pm
Unfortunately, the government’s policies benefit and have ‘saved’ the ‘ruling, financial aristocracy’ from ruin, by putting them on welfare for millionaires. Reversing this ‘class-war’ policy, will require challneging the power structure of society and massive, entrenched, inequality, and how likely is that? …… Writerman 12 Feb, 2012 - 8:21 am
How very odd, Writerman, that you do not see that governments' policies and markets' actions have exposed and are highlighting the rigged and easily abused ways in which control of paper money, which has now morphed into the electronic transfer of notional sum of spontaneous, arbitrarily decided fiat currency wealth, renders you slaves to misery, and the whims of those who fool you into thinking that everything can be bought and therefore great wealth is an overwhelming power, rather than a global indicator to any and all of that which needs to be addressed and/or physically attacked and destroyed should things not change beyond present recognition and perception.It is illogical to not think, and to think that things do not radically change and evolve, and to imagine that the status quo position is tenable and to be supported, is to display a lack of intelligence which allows systems vulnerabilities to be ruthlessly exploited and old wealth to be transferred into new virtualised programs replacing old analogue systems.
.......................................................................................................................................................................
AmanfromMars ….. on http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2012/02/the-mystery-of-quantitive-easing/
12 Feb, 2012 - 4:43 pm
Clarke,
What I mean is that ‘… a vast apparatus of permanent unelected Government exists. This permanent Government consists of senior civil servants, intelligence and security officers, key figures in certain city and financial institutions, key industrialists and directors of major monopolistic companies, senior politicians.’ I also mean that they control a vast web of secret companies and resources. ….. Ruth 12 Feb, 2012 - 10:33 am
And of course, Ruth, one mustn't forget numerous other old government cabals, for whenever parties lose power and supposedly then slip into opposition, those who then leave the immediate media spotlight of daily soap and political punch and judy stage would still have old alliances and past acquaintances/sensitive, national secrets to nurture and milk to keep them in clover.One needs to look no further than Blair to see the truth in that. And all of them working against each other and trying to prevent their powers/controls from being outed/eroded. No wonder there is collapse and chaos.
And yes, I suppose Mr Brown is an exception, but then he never ever did really "get it", did he. And quite what Cameron is hoping for, with his headless chicken routines and posse of populist SpAds, suggests he's never gonna make it out of the baby pool, which is just as well considering what tender, easy meat he'd be for the sharks should he ever venture into the deep lawless waters of the Great Game.
Do the intelligence services, as a matter of routine, monitor their every communication? And if not, why on earth leave such a glaring hole in international security wide open to abuse? It is not intelligent, is it? In fact, it is incredibly stupid and naive, methinks.
J'accuse, MI5/MI6/GCHQ.
Hell, Werritty and Fox and Gould were pissing all over them, weren't they?
.......................................................................................................................................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment