Sunday, 10 November 2013

131109/131110

The sharing of knowledge doesn’t centralize power; it disperses it. The hard part isn’t the sharing; it’s finding ways to limit the sharing long enough to give markets the incentive to develop the know-how in the first place.
That is quite typically almost the truth and therefore most probably a self-serving meme for and/or from an establishment with established practices that are now known to be perverse and corrupting and easily manipulated to collapse human administration systems by virtual machine remote control. And how very sad that it should have been said to render the speaker diminished and outed as totally out of touch with the worlds of today and the spaces of tomorrow.
The sharing of knowledge doesn’t centralize power; it disperses it and enables reinforcing empowerment of beta alternative solutions programs/novel field projects. The hard part isn’t the sharing; it’s finding ways to ensure limit on the sharing are long and shorted enough to give markets the incentive to develop the know-how of how to make money to invest and driver leaderships in command and control of such developments in the first place.
You may like to consider that very particular and peculiar requirement may be a whole new market with any number of stealthy networks servering necessarily designedly secretive provision autonomously and is already deeply embedded and working ITs Magic in QuITe COSMIC Circles/SMARTR Round Tables/CyberIntelAIgent Ware and Great Vapourware War Games Rooms. It is surely something that be quite normal and a fully to be expected progression for quants who see all of the weaknesses in machines and programming which can be utilised for gainful zeroday exploitation of systemic vulnerabilities.
....................................................................................

No comments: