By the way, what was it that Andrew Mitchell said? And why did he choose not to share it immediately rather than deny that which was reported to be that which he said?
Was it born and borne of arrogance or ignorance, such a strategy?
----
He has. He recorded himself doing it when he met the reps from the Federation. They then lied about it.
Do try to keep up.
By the way there was a profile of Mitchel on R4 last night. They suggested that he is not the arrogant slimy git that some would wish to paint him. …. Originally Posted by BuggerAll
Well then, what was it that he said he said*? Why is it such a pathetic state secret?
And you can surely always rely on R4 and the BBC to paint a sympathetic picture of plebs in the hoi polloi and government office and Westminster. They know who butters their bread and are well versed and schooled in what needs to be said to have things moving along nicely in certain directions. And some in office can all to easily, normally because of a severe lack of humility and empathy, paint themselves in a quite true and utterly distasteful light.
* Is the definitive answer shared somewhere within the 60+ pages of this thread? Or are we all chattering about something we don't know, which be really bizarre but quite normal for humans
..........................................................................
Clearing the Air .... to avoid Misunderestimations
Read through all the pages, you'll see the link to the transcript of the recording of the infamous meeting, as well as the recording. You'll see posts which state clearly what was said. Then come back and ask "what did he say".
Also, you are trying to say that the BBC would paint a sympathetic picture regarding a Tory MP? Did you see the coverage that the BBC gave the initial incident, complete with analysis' that strongly hinted Mitchell was the liar and not the police? The same BBC that recently admitted it's left-wing bias? The same BBC who allowed a joke that inferred Prince Harry snorted Bolivian Marching Powder to be read out by someone who is a known member of a left-wing anti-royalist movement on HIGNFY on Friday (and couldn't even get the name of one of the Godparents of Kate and Wullie's sprog right)?
Yeah, that's the Beeb who kowtows to the "Establishment", the Beeb which has always been a bastion of support for the Tory party, the Beeb who would do anything rather than show any sort of bias towards left-wing ideals. ....... Posted by hellsbrink
Actually, hellsbrink, I was really bemoaning the fact that the BBC are so ineffectual in delivering great change with their command and control of programming …. “Nation shall speak peace unto nation” … and all that, for all they usually share with us is bad and oppressive and austere news, and daily, pontifications of politicians, who now seem to imagine that they can be self-appointed to govern the masses rather than be elected by a necessarily decisive electoral vote.
Probably a new creative direction team is required at the top to lead and boldly go where never before, if they want to be recognised and lauded as revolutionary forward thinking rather than realised to be cuckolded and impotent.
The 15Ps …. Proper Preparation and Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance Permitting Prime Prize Penetration and Perfect Pursuit of Project Parameters …. is most probably something they haven’t been trained in to any degree which would ensure and guarantee continuity of stealthy success.
......................................................................
He has. He recorded himself doing it when he met the reps from the Federation. They then lied about it.
Do try to keep up.
By the way there was a profile of Mitchel on R4 last night. They suggested that he is not the arrogant slimy git that some would wish to paint him. …. Originally Posted by BuggerAll
Well then, what was it that he said he said*? Why is it such a pathetic state secret?
And you can surely always rely on R4 and the BBC to paint a sympathetic picture of plebs in the hoi polloi and government office and Westminster. They know who butters their bread and are well versed and schooled in what needs to be said to have things moving along nicely in certain directions. And some in office can all to easily, normally because of a severe lack of humility and empathy, paint themselves in a quite true and utterly distasteful light.
* Is the definitive answer shared somewhere within the 60+ pages of this thread? Or are we all chattering about something we don't know, which be really bizarre but quite normal for humans
----
But it's not the responsibility of the media to bring any sort of "great change", their news department is there to report news and not to force the political views of the organisation upon the wider public, which is something they have forgotten.
Oh, and your linkee appears as part of the advertising on this site, type "Cre@tive" and the site automatically links to the part of Amazon which is concerned with selling stuff from Creatïve Labs. It isn't the only word which does that, so don't get yourself in a tizz wondering why such strange things happen. .... Posted by hellsbrink
OK, .... then whose responsibility is it to bring any sort of great change, just so that they may targeted with stores and ammunition, hellsbrink?
Is it now transferred to the World Wide Web and Alternate Sublimely InterNetworking Media or are the Military and Intelligence Agencies, with the likes of their newbie cyber offensive and defense operations and systems/Offices of Cyber Security, thinking to be a viable and instructive and constructive force to reckoned with, rather than overwhelmed and extraordinarily rendered practically and virtually useless by that and/or those with live experience to die for in ITs Fields?
Who and/or what does one contact for a chat on such matters as command and control global matters nowadays? A banker, an oligarch, an internet entrepreneur, a Sun Tzu military man, a George Smiley spook type, a wannabe government wonk, for one doesn't want to waste any time or effort having a chat with an organisation or department or machine because they do nothing new and without first checking with a boss who be its current power leadership representative/creative director?
cc ...... cyber at ukti dot gsi dot gov dot uk ?
Ps .... We will have to agree to disagree on the premise and abdication .... But it's not the responsibility of the media to bring any sort of "great change"
.......................................................................
A cuckold or a stud? The choice is yours.
* Yes, I could have checked out the site in incognito mode, but I prefer to have my browser history recorded (by the browser and the NSA – hi guys) so I can revisit sources.
Having it recorded in cognito mode can really fcuk up their admins and leverage systems whenever the trail led be intentionally false and excitingly compromising. Although one does have to wonder and ponder whether it would matter a jot in the greater scheme of things in the company of intelligent beings, and/or be just one of those crazy things to have great fun with.
................................................................................
Re: The Government wants to teach all children English. Here is why it’s a stupid idea!
Nice one, phil_bennett.
And aint We need leaders who can knock up a prototype app before lunch then wow the board of directors in the afternoon the GOD's aweful truth.:-)
GOD = Global Operating Devices.
.............................................................................
>whenever the trail led be intentionally false and excitingly compromising
Subjunctive can be very useful, but not here. ....Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 28th October 2013 09:30 GMT
Well, it be certainly not really useful for NSA type botched operations, AC, that's for sure. Paradoxically though, that would sort of automatically make them [such trails that lead to misleading tales] really practical for counter-intelligence missions and bods and boffins and molls on AIMissions that botch snooping operations and provide a novel phorm of CyberIntelAIgent Security and Virtual Protection?
And that be already twice today this morning that something has been said that might be of interest to whoever or whatever be at the receiving end of cyber at ukti dot gsi dot gov dot uk
...................................................................................
Is this article "
The End of Britain" .....
http://info.moneyweek.com/urgent-bulletins/the-end-of-britain/... a full metal jacket packet of lies or the bitter sweet truth that no one in the pay of corrupt systems and in governments and/or political office/ponzi employment will utter and reveal or deny be the reality of present day existence?
It could almost have be written by Daily Bell Staff.
...................................................................................
Yep , Paxman 2-0. Strangely there is something about Brand trying to come out but it's like interviewing a teenager about idealism. Brand apparently wants to change the world without taking responsibility and he has no idea how this all works. ..... Posted by LeoRoverman
Is the story told here ...
The End Of Britain .... how it all works exceedingly badly/madly? Is it the truth shared there or a pack of lies which politics would never spin and reveal to you as being certainly untrue?
................................................................................
