Avoiding American-influenced crypto is just today's logic, based on what we know, today. The crypto industry is now in a crisis of trust. This is going to get worse.
Quite so, lang, this is only the beginning of a fundamental change in the way that things are to be better done with virtual betas in the future. And those few words have been chosen very careful to try and accurately reflect and convey what is to be expected, for it is already launching programs with stealthy agents into all critical components and strategic elements of global remote command and virtual machine and SCADA control systems.
And things will be considerably better after they have finished being significantly worse for corrupt and corrupted systems admin of present day strife policies.
And fortunately, there is nothing nobody can do to stop the intelligent march of information progress and any and all who would be foolish and stupid enough to try, just merely identify themselves as persons of interest to be appropriately and summarily dealt with.
New Great Games have New Great Games Players and they be not guided nor mindful of stupid rules and regulations designed by generations with secrets to keep in order to profit from unfair and/or inequitable advantage with privileges.
Posted by: amanfromMars at October 6, 2013 12:54 PM ….. having a say on https://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/001447.html
.........................................................................................
to: John Young
date: Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:34 AM
subject: Privacy and Cybersecurity Illusions Have to Go
Good Morning, John,
to: John Young
date: Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:34 AM
subject: Privacy and Cybersecurity Illusions Have to Go
Good Morning, John,
In light of the situation revealed re the information shared on http://cryptome.org/2013/10/privacy-cybersec-illusions-go.htm are we to reasonably expect the pursuit of natural justice and class action law suits for fraudulent trading etc. against businesses/business executives selling virtual security ware which is just vapourware and unfit for perceived purpose, or is an ignorance defence an arrogant strategy to be deployed and employed to escape accountability and responsibility and time served in a state correctional facility*?
Or is that a relatively new and industrious multi-billion dollar business which has the blessing of the markets and ...... well, for want of a better expression than just Power Elite Players, Executive Server Systems Administrations.
Regards,
* .... which itself may be as described, a fraudulent trading entity and right dodgy business creating other than model citizens.
.................................................................................................
amanfromMars …. sharing a true view on http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/10359520/Banks-put-to-the-test-over-cyber-security.html
In a simulated attack is nothing ever going to go terribly wrong and nothing of real defence value will be learned ...... although obviously because of the exercise, does the system probably realise and know it is highly susceptible to, and some would would even posit, catastrophically vulnerable to smarter zeroday vulnerability attack against which there is no possible defence ..... other than, if the system is lucky and wants to remain in the business of providing cash for whatever it imagines is good for its business of providing cash, providing cash to that which can collapse it to not collapse it.
A Danegeld Payment for Guaranteed Non Attack Virtual Security Provision/Poacher turned Great Game Keeper Guardian. It is not as if cash payments, even whenever just electronic transfer of digital figures to numbered accounts, are of anything valuable whenever realiseable in paper fiat currency bills and treasury notes. Hell, it is only paper and ink and that cost virtually nothing. The expense arrives and arises whenever payments are made to the wrong sort of enterprise and fat cat or thin client and/or denied to the right type of customer with the banks interests at the heart and soul of their own totally separate and diverse operations.
..........................................................................................................
amanfromMars …..posting a reply and invitation to anonymously party on http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/34650/Reuters-to-US-Economy-Our-Heart-Will-Go-On/
The following is as relevant here as it is where earlier posted, DB
amanfromMars …. sharing a true view on http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/10359520/Banks-put-to-the-test-over-cyber-security.html
In a simulated attack is nothing ever going to go terribly wrong and nothing of real defence value will be learned ...... although obviously because of the exercise, does the system probably realise and know it is highly susceptible to, and some would would even posit, catastrophically vulnerable to smarter zeroday vulnerability attack against which there is no possible defence ..... other than, if the system is lucky and wants to remain in the business of providing cash for whatever it imagines is good for its business of providing cash, providing cash to that which can collapse it to not collapse it.
A Danegeld Payment for Guaranteed Non Attack Virtual Security Provision/Poacher turned Great Game Keeper Guardian. It is not as if cash payments, even whenever just electronic transfer of digital figures to numbered accounts, are of anything valuable whenever realiseable in paper fiat currency bills and treasury notes. Hell, it is only paper and ink and that cost virtually nothing. The expense arrives and arises whenever payments are made to the wrong sort of enterprise and fat cat or thin client and/or denied to the right type of customer with the banks interests at the heart and soul of their own totally separate and diverse operations.
New players in different fields, novel paths in alternate journeys, DB ..... for a Revolutionary Change that delivers more than just Impotent Hope and Mainstream Despair.
................................................................................................................
Cowardly pussies are not what Canucks need leading*
Did anyone seriously think BB had any future ? .....Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 7th October 2013 13:05 GMT
Well, many didn't expect them to roll over and surrender without a fight and leave their troupers without ammunition to wage greater intelligent virtualware war games against mediocre global opposition, AC. Would BB10 phone holders be due a full refund for a grave mis-selling operation and/or be entitled to a free transfer to another mobile phone operating system? Or do customers not matter a jot?
*Although maybe top management had nothing novel and game-changing to offer ie they be intellectual property bankrupt
...............................................................................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment