Anthony, Hi,
You may like to consider that the Internet already has its controllers and the likes of the old monied power elites, ..... who can try buying up what they now presently lack for future continuity of control, and the likes of the Murdoch empire which would try to cast a certain perception with their manipulation of provided programs and selective news items, which are only subjective tales in reaction to a planned event, which itself started out as a imaginative notion to be made a reality with its sharing, ...... are just not clever enough to process information into intelligence which renders to them what they desire.
The controllers of the Internet may not desire that the present, sub-prime, intellectually inadequate, establishment oldies have any future control over others, other than as a funders and supporters of those who would be exercising their remote virtual control in ...... well, a New World Order is what it exactly is, is it not?
It is new intelligence which you can share in an instant with everyone and which bursts misleading bubbles and false spin and would invite you to test it for all of its certain truths, which leads programs now. Money can buy those new intelligence suppliers, but to imagine that money can control them is to make a mistake which would identify oneself has being in need of the new intelligence being bought.
http://thedailybell.com/2596/Anthony-Wile-Rupert-Murdochs-Failing-Attempts-to-Control-the-Internet-Reformation
....................................................................................
Posted by amanfromMars on 07/02/11 08:03 AM
"DB: "As the conversation shifts, Murdoch has to shift with it."
The "conversation" is the intellectual environment, what, statistically, people consider as truth and, therefore, align their chioces and actions with. Elites know, damn well without "consent of the governed", they and their endeavors are adrift, without support at best and, when they push, outright opposition. "Consent" has been subverted (devolved) from "fully informed, willing", to "misinformed. defrauded", to "terror to defy" and, with increasingly available objective information is evolving back to where it started, people having a say in their OWN lives. It is the power to define and craft faux "reality" that our slavers seek to retain, since without plausible "reasons" for our collective servitude (a goal, which can only be achieved by usage of force / fraud, since honest, mutually agreed trade is NOT slavery), there WILL be serious blowback. THINK about it:
http://www.nazisociopaths.org/modules/article/view.article.php/c1/33
Quite so, rossbcan, and the three reasons you have quoted for the demise of crooked control, are spread at an exponential pace and have already gone way past the critical mass stage for exercise of new player, Great Game global controls.
DB: "It took the elites about 350- 400 years to control the Press and to begin to monopolize its output. Thus, it may take the elites about 50-75 years to control the Internet."
They did so by consolidation of ownership of the means of information dissemnation into THEIR hands, thus controlling the script. The internet is different. In order to control it, they must restrict (censor) information available and destroy the adhoc, bidirectional, peer to peer one to one / many nature of the internet. In other words they must turn the internet into a unicast one to many broadcast means, with no way for extraneous information to detract from the "script".
This doomed endeavor will fail for three reasons:
First, any limitation of internet functionality will reduce value, but not cost. Free market alternatives will spring up like multi-heade hydras, growing a new head as each is cut off. The "value" of controlled media will plunge, as Murdoch discovered.
Second, the engineers / scientists who design / control the internet are very bright people. They will, en masse, provide alternative solutions when infrastructure becomes crippled by control. In fact, the internet is designed to be fault tolerant, routing around information transmission impediments. To a communications engineer, political or any other control of the free flow of information is a fault, as in general any who oppose the march of truth and freedom are "faulty" and will invoke a response proportional to and sufficient to counter any harm they may inflict.
Third, users will form their own private ad-hoc networks, unobservable by elites. If there is anything elites hate worse than their information / plans being exposed it is for others to have the ability to "conspire" against them, in secret and unobserved until it is time to unleash blowback.
Its ALL about choice. Be very careful regarding who / what YOU allow to influence YOU. Free, fully informed choice is a matter of individual and collective survival:
http://www.nazisociopaths.org/modules/article/view.article.php/36" ..... Posted by rossbcan on 07/02/11 07:20 AM
http://thedailybell.com/2596/Anthony-Wile-Rupert-Murdochs-Failing-Attempts-to-Control-the-Internet-Reformation
....................................................................................
Posted by amanfromMars on 07/02/11 08:22 AM
And here is some crazy IMF advice which just shows how intellectually bankrupt the system's monkeys and organ grinders are ...... http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/commentary-mainmenu-43/8051-imf-wants-us-debt-ceiling-raised-immediately
And the Daily Bell get a first class, ringside seat mention in the piece too :-)
http://thedailybell.com/2596/Anthony-Wile-Rupert-Murdochs-Failing-Attempts-to-Control-the-Internet-Reformation
....................................................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment