An honourable member and old style Etonian with his credibility blown away, would always do the right thing and resign immediately before anyone even considered highlighting their untenable and fraudulent leadership position bringing Parliamentary politics and Royal approval into disrepute.
So who is leading/running UKGBNI, whenever it is not a competent media friendly government and muppet puppet/Punch and Judy show opposition?
In such times would one normally have expected Intelligence to step into the fray and supply exactly what is required to save the day, so what is one to think about the obvious delay?
Are those services also unfit for Greater Great Game purposes and global leadership ……. which is always a head personnel with zero fab fabless vision problem.
Go down that rabbit hole and you’ll find an unholy Congressional mess worthy of a traitorous medal that stinks to high heavens, methinks, but that is most probably where all the answers lie in dirty little secrets to be concealed by conceited obfuscation in injudicious review of questions to supply non answers and therefore exactly where all must be taken to ensure that the future is saved from the past to generate a better present.
If the News International board had any wit, they would be employing better intelligence to provide them with news which presents an altogether different and better beta future program rather than suffering the past with its folly of sub-prime ministerial fools and arrogant tools trailing and trading shadowy disinformation in the Harry Limelight …… and that change is one of those new fangled and qubit entangling virtualisation games for Greater Great Game Intelligence in Emergent Novel AI Fields for transparent exemplar management of human perception, AAA rated [Astute Active and Anonymous] and cosmically assured and secured to ensure and insure performance is suitably stellar and untouchable …… Per Ardua ad MetaAstra.
Who has responsibility for ensuring that the future is assured for News International? Is it a situations vacant position at present or just something which you would not need to know because of the nature of such works, and therefore something you will never know being MkUltraSensitive Proprietary Information and/or Private Intellectual Property to Boot?
Given the news we are led to believe is worth sharing, must one conclude it is the former and thus is it an opportunity which would define the sector’s main players.
Of Virtual Waters and Stormy Sees …… The Great Game has New Fab Fabless Players?
Given the stealthy sophistication of the “well-coordinated, ongoing, state-run cyberespionage operation”* and its named targets/systems it is detected in [in Iran, Israel, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Egypt*], is it more likely to be a Western state or an Eastern state intelligence service?
Or is to tar the likes of an NSA/GCHQ listening post or a Russian or Chinese operation with the responsibility, unhelpful and even subversive, as it would immediately shift global perception on the competence of nation states to defend themselves cyber intelligence wise against invisible and intangible attacks/squirmishes/sorties?
Interesting days ahead, methinks, …… which will make a pleasant change from all of the usual sub-prime nonsense peddled to sustain dodgy markets and corrupt systems of administration.