120804

amanfromMars 4 August 2012 at 5:09 am    ….. http://sluggerotoole.com/2012/08/03/digitallunch-can-digital-journalism-ever-pay/

“join Slugger’s own #DigitalLunch #hangoutsonair with myself and Michael Wilson, MD of +UTV, as we discuss whether digital journalism can add value to the bottom of news organisations…“

You are asking completely the wrong question there, Mick, whenever one is pioneering virgin markets and supplying lead to systems at the fronts which would be drivering the freight train that would be a provisional internet/world wide webs of really smart advanced intelligence networkings ….SMARTR IntelAIgents Networking.

The question[s] which traditional news reporting media is loathe to ask, because of the implications which are then realised in its/their asking, is whether news organisations can add value to the top tiers of virtual space/digital journalism, or whether they will choose and continue to battle in vain against the new media tide in order to try and lead and influence/brainwash the masses with old establishment news and ideas which are already out of date and out of touch with the New Wave and ITs Future Savvy Internetional Networkers by the time that it is aired/viewed/shared in places on Earth?

And let it be known that those whom you suppose are providing leadership to the province from the highest positions and offices held and appointed to in Stormont, have been advised on the changed paradigm. And the unity of their response would belie all of those notions pimped by media that there is unbridgeable division and disunity of common great purpose in the house on the hill. More anon as more is revealed of their leading initiatives with further detailed information on shared future initiatives programs and projects.

And there y’all were, probably thinking that in their jolly hols they were all lying on beach in some exotic location doing next to nothing worthwhile and ground breaking, and just spending taxpayers’ money with no thought of how to repay it with the provision of great public service.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Sat, 08/04/2012 – 09:55 | amanfromMars …… commenting on http://www.zerohedge.com/news/friday-humor-i-am-pledging-cut-deficit-we-inherited-half-end-my-first-term-office

What appears to be more likely by the end of a second term, and it would be supported by extrapolation of both of those graphs, is that both the US deficit and US debt are to double rather than be halved and that would be a massive 400% miscalculation/monumental lie visited upon a nation, whose natives, and supposed allies for that matter too, haven’t a clue about what they should being, or what should be done to rectify the situation which the rest of the world is seeing and recognising is a fatal weakness and catastrophic vulnerability to be exploited to render the New American Century Project, a dead duck in stormy toxic financial waters.

Someone once said, and it has been oft repeated and even attributed to Albert Einstein, that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, and that appears to be all that is on global offer. And how pathetic is that of Supposed Intelligent Mankind! Pretty stupid of them, heh?

But hey, it was noticed before and commented on, too …….. “Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that.
I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.” ~~ Frank Zappa (1940-1993)

Nice one, Frank Z ….. there aint no denying that truism, as the systems they use and are enslaved to, to provide for their future enslavement, prove over and over again.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

amanfromMars …. having a say on http://sluggerotoole.com/2012/08/04/unsatisfactory-ripe-for-challenge-borders-on-the-absurd/
4 August 2012 at 3:57 pm

Comrade,
I have brought it to Mick’s attention. It is dangerous to Slugger. ….. Mister_Joe, 4 August 2012 at 3:19 pm

What is dangerous to Slugger? That certain members of the Bar are universally perceived as being pompous and arrogant self serving opinionated and ethically amoral bullies? Oh please, there is no new news in that opinion and observation, surely? And times must be lean for them all nowadays, with so few ignorant and easily led thud nuts/virtual mental patients at large in the community, to prosecute and/or defend as the case may be.

One can surely expect some strange decisions from them to try and generate some crazy income from whoever they can convince that black is white and grey will not matter? Is that not what they all do for a living, or is that only applicable to some or most of them?

And please note that there are a lot of valid questions there, which are hardly ever answered truthfully?
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………