120806

Great Game Play …… Non State Actors Rules  ….. with a passing nod to Cotonou rules of engagement

Date: Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:05 AM
To: cryptome@earthlink.net

Hi John,

It is as well that as many folk as possible know of what is transpiring in cyberspace for command and control of the human hearts and minds mined field. Spooky DARPA/IARPA type territory which can be plausibly denied by them as being anything that they control, although it may be a step too far from belief to have them deny that it is an area of extreme interest and endeavouring curiosity, because of the undoubted advantages and benefits that ensue and accrue/flow and strengthen.

With regard to the information provided from the webpage ….  http://cryptome.org/2012-info/spy-chiefs/spy-chiefs.htm ….. and thanks for the narratives …… it is wise to consider  the following, which as far as anyone may know and therefore not know, because of live current security, peace and order considerations, may be an already mounted critical probability power event against which there is no possible effective defence or attack.

National Security Agency Director Gen. Keith Alexander speaking about cybersecurity and the new threats posed to the U.S. economy and military at the American Enterprise Institute July 9, 2012 in Washington, DC. said that in cyberspace ‘the probability for crisis is mounting,’ and that now is the time for putting into place strong policies and rules for operations and defense.

And who and/or what would such strong policies and rules for operations and defense of, and in cyberspace, be directed against/with/to? And what undoubted advantages and benefits would be offered to ensure that any and all efforts and expenditures and intellectual credibility are not scuppered and lost irretrievably …… and further tuned beyond remote economic and military controls and turned against their hosts to exploit cyber vulnerability advantage to the greater mutual benefit of what would then be surely recognised as seriously smarter virtual terrain team players about which nothing would be generally known because of national, international and internetional security and dodgy classified information protection interests?

Regards,
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………