200618

amanfromMars 1 Thu 18 Jun 06:14 [2006180614] ….. pointing out the way it is on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2020/06/17/galaxy_earth_planets/

Re: “Getting to them is, however, quite another kettle of fish”

So you’re saying if we ignore science then we can do it, right?
If that’s the case, the Government seem like the ones in the best position to get us there. …. logicalextreme

That’s an extremely perverse and subversive fuzzy lazy logic exercised there, amigo, which requires more immediate action from actors, both state and non-state, sooner rather than later because of the true nature on Earth of both elected and fascist governments alike for they be both parasitic and inevitably deadly self-destructive, hence the rush needed to get anything planned long term done ‽ .

“You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives for not working for, another person must work for without receiving.

The government cannot give anybody anything that the government does not first take from someone else.

When half of the people get the idea they do not have to work, because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work, because someone else is going to get what they work for, that my friends is the beginning of the end of any nation.”

And they just can’t help themselves from taking and using future generations wealth to pay for present situations which are predicated upon past gross practices.

…………………………………….

amanfromMars 1 Thu 18 Jun 15:49 [2006181549] …… being agreeable on https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2020/06/17/cloud_services_hacking/

Re: Stop over complicating statistics!

Amen to that, Daniel Hall.

………………………………………

amanfromMars [2006181625] …. giving whole-hearted unconditional support on https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/bank-england-announces-only-ps100bn-qe-expansion-unexpectedly-hawkish-statement

We may, however, see some evolution in the funding schemes for banks, to support lending to the economy. This could raise a few eyebrows, but has the potential to be more successful in increasing the flow of credit than cutting base rates alone.”

Yes please, that would be very nice. And a tad revolutionary too, methinks.

……………………………………………..