Sunday 3 April 2016

160403

AMANFROMMARS WROTE ON SUN, 04/03/2016 - 02:25 [1604030724] ….. sharing a sensible, not at all crazy notion on http://www.afcea.org/content/?q=Article-cyber-not-always-answer
Who Dares Win Wins Wisely ‽ .
“It’s important for folks to recognize that cyber is not the solution to everything. A cyber response is not always the right mechanism to respond to a cyber event that happens to us,” he says.
Quite so. A very simple and effective response can easily be an appropriate significant and attractive dollar payment in exchange for a binding undertaking/memorandum of understanding to stop an unfolding cyber event and/or an imagined possible and thought highly likely to be initiated event.
After all, it is not as if the cost to save something/everything deemed valuable and worth defending, was rescued by anything expensive whenever it is just pretty paper/fiat promissory notes. Indeed, such payments are a mutually beneficial godsend in that they can be freely spent on all manner of things and services which immediately returns the investment back to source .... for further engaging investment opportunities/zeroday vulnerability exploits.
.....................................................

Hi, Anonymous,
All comments to C42 Quantum Communication Control Systems are not censored by AI@ITsWork. And second and third party thoughts shared to its websites will always be aired for consideration.
If you are referring to the SIGNAL Magazine [AFCEA] website, I have no idea at all about how they deal with comments which they provide a facility for. It is disappointing, and maybe even quite revealing, that comments supplied do not automatically immediately appear for greater viewing.
3 April 2016 at 18:24
...........................................................

No comments: