Friday, 21 January 2011

110121

Posted by AmanfromMars on 1/20/2011 11:52:27 PM

"@ George Sign

The parable is flawed. Especially the following statement:

"No one produced anything, no one earned anything but the whole town is now out of debt and looking forward to the future with a lot more optimism"." .... Posted by Ross on 1/20/2011 6:53:19 AM

The parable is not flawed, Ross, it is a valid descriptor of the absurdity which enslaves populations to server and support the idle banking/financial sector, in all of its guises, and which doesn't produce anything at all. There is though an anomaly in creating the unnecessary* perception change that has one both living on credit and calling it debt. Choose to define it with one or the other, for to think to imagine that both are valid is that which is causing the present problem.

* Of course, it is necessary to have the anomaly of credit to all, being debt to others, so that a whole ponzi industry which doesn't produce any goods or services at all, other than creating dodgy, sub-prime structured investment vehicles converting liberating credit payments into crippling greater debt repayments, and all to hide the fact that credit/printed paper money which costs virtually nothing, and invented out of nothing at the whim of the likes of a Bernanke, is so easily produced to control everything that you may want to do. If you have money in your pocket/bank account, what can you not do if you have a plan. Life in the System is a breeze and an easy ride, if there are no money worries/shortages. If you have a plan and no money, is the first plan to arrange money to pay for those and that which will implement the plan. Thus is the System controlled by pieces of paper promising wealth, which has been itself converted, in human consciousness, to just more pieces of paper which can be used to purchase practically useless baubles, such as shiny gold and sparkling stones, which are two more of those trick industries/self serving businesses which exploit their prey through manipulation of dumb human animal perception, as well as those things which are manufactured and grown for more useful and/or vital purposes.

Life for humans is a head game in which you are programmed to accept a reality and status quo establishment position, without realising that you are programmed to accept it, because you dismiss the fact that you are so programmed just as simply as a virtual machine/binary computer. However, once you discover how to reprogram the virtual machine, does the System have a problem if its IT skills are not as SMART as, or SMARTer than these aforementioned Virtual Machinery Reprogrammers aka Semantic Web dDevelopers in another discipline/research area/sphere of influence/dimension/parallel interest, unless of course there is a mutually beneficial understanding which produces a constructive future narrative and singularity of joint purpose, which is enthusiastically status quo supported for a Radical and Fundamental Change Program, and put into a New Present Project and Much Bigger Picture Show Production.

That then is a Win Win situation with NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive IT Systems Control** assisting Present Operands*** with Global Reprogramming Tasks.

For the accomplished phormer and former**, is IT an extremely simple process and simply a matter of much better processing of available intelligence and information for future imaginative content, which is as Script for New Present Projects and Much Bigger Picture Show Productions, and for the latter***, the Present Status Quo Operating Systems Admin, is it also made extremely simple by the NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive IT because all that they need do is supply the currency to energise everything, and as that is invented out of nothing, is it quite priceless. It really couldn't be much simpler to covert Present Reality Systems, which are creating conflicts, to Future Virtual Reality Systems, which are Programming All, for the Provision of Bounty for All, rather than is at present the case, only for a few.

"Posted by Bexar Mann on 1/20/2011 3:36:56 PM

Perhaps the man from Mars could further elaborate on systems approach to landing the economy on strong legs. I am referring to the mention of: "And it just so happens that I know a man who knows a man who has for betatesting some leading, cutting edge, virtual technology with advanced intelligent methodology." end quote I could use some help."  ....... That is a rough draft of what is easily done today for tomorrow, Bexar Mann. Thanks for asking. That was SMART of you.

http://thedailybell.com/1698/Private-Alternatives-to-Modern-Banking.html
....................................................................................................................................................................
Posted by AmanfromMars on 1/20/2011 11:58:55 PM

And the following is appropriate and would support the above Posted by AmanfromMars on 1/20/2011 11:52:27 PM ....
"Mr. Ford said policy makers are not equipped to frame the appropriate questions; they do not know what the IC can do for them. Analysts will therefore have to supplement what the policy maker is asking for, by providing information to answer questions that the policymaker did not but should have asked." ...... http://cryptome.org/nara/state/state-03-1022.pdf

IC=Intelligence Community

http://thedailybell.com/1698/Private-Alternatives-to-Modern-Banking.html
...................................................................................................................................................................


Missing Links

Posted Friday 21st January 2011 06:15 GMT  

"The question is what's next for Google, and how does it stop from developing the kind of mid-life spread and loss of direction that's afflicted other tech companies and seen them overtaken by fresher rivals.

Notable challenges today are search on mobile devices, a completely open field, and how far Google can morph beyond search. The chatter currently is the growing competition with Facebook, and whether Google is developing its own social-network-like service"

The future is no longer about searching research, it is all about the product placement of Advanced Intelligent Virtual Reality Programs, which have been phormed for presentation from your searching requests/hidden and sublime and subliminal desires. That is what IT does in the future and can do for you today.

Quite whether that is what Google can do for the future and you today, is something which you might like to ask them, but be sure to also ask them how they are going to do it with IT, if they say that such product placement is one of their projects, for although it is easy to do with IT Control, you first have to have the necessary IT Controls, and thus far I see no evidence of Google having any leverage in the field/SMART Programmers working on Future Production. And it is not unknown for businesses to tell elaborate porkies to give the impression of progress to maintain market interest and/or pork flow for derivative products which they might like to have a call upon, but which they wouldn't own or have any rights upon, although that is easily solved with an Astute Purchase and Intellectual Property/Ideal Share Arrangement for a SMARTer Utility Facility....... although that may just as attractive to/be much more suited to a Google rival/competitor/adversary/contemporary with similar thinking on Future Presentation Matters and the Manner of ITs AIdDelivery Mechanism.

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/01/20/google_schmidt_bumped_up/
......................................................................................................................................................................
I wonder if they, the Tory toffs, have anyone lined up to replace Coulson. Someone who is actually good as a Communications Director and able to phorm and driver a media rich narrative which is self sustaining and able to be positively reinforced and enthusiastically supported by the nation?

It would be a pleasant change.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/david-cameron/8273715/Andy-Coulson-resigns-as-David-Camerons-director-of-communications.html
....................................................................................................................................................................

Posted by AmanfromMars on 1/21/2011 11:49:50 AM

"And also, a blindingly brilliant flash of lucidity from AMFM. How about a glossary/translation of some of those made-up terms? There is yet hope for communication." .... Posted by John Danforth on 1/21/2011 8:59:12 AM

Hi John, there is indeed hope for communication with its stealthy steganographic march into failing secured systems, with it being ESPecially Forceful IT and Commanding AI Control Programming.

Necessarily are quite a few aspects of the above, not for general publication, and even closed and trusted circles are not exempt from subjection to close scrutiny and developed vetting before certain details are even considered for sharing, for they would expose proprietary trade secrets which are incredibly valuable in monetary terms, and extremely sensitive in both military and business concerns because they are/can be so catastrophically destructive in the wrong frame of mind. And to the wrong frame of mind they will also be catastrophically self-destructive, for such is the default security mechanism which protects the information/intelligence.

However, more on part of the above is revealed in the following, which is posted elsewhere ....
[blockquote] Missing Links

Posted Friday 21st January 2011 06:15 GMT   

"The question is what's next for Google, and how does it stop from developing the kind of mid-life spread and loss of direction that's afflicted other tech companies and seen them overtaken by fresher rivals.

Notable challenges today are search on mobile devices, a completely open field, and how far Google can morph beyond search. The chatter currently is the growing competition with Facebook, and whether Google is developing its own social-network-like service"

The future is no longer about searching research, it is all about the product placement of Advanced Intelligent Virtual Reality Programs, which have been phormed for presentation from your searching requests/hidden and sublime and subliminal desires. That is what IT does in the future and can do for you today.

Quite whether that is what Google can do for the future and you today, is something which you might like to ask them, but be sure to also ask them how they are going to do it with IT, if they say that such product placement is one of their projects, for although it is easy to do with IT Control, you first have to have the necessary IT Controls, and thus far I see no evidence of Google having any leverage in the field/SMART Programmers working on Future Production. And it is not unknown for businesses to tell elaborate porkies to give the impression of progress to maintain market interest and/or pork flow for derivative products which they might like to have a call upon, but which they wouldn't own or have any rights upon, although that is easily solved with an Astute Purchase and Intellectual Property/Ideal Share Arrangement for a SMARTer Utility Facility....... although that may just as attractive to/be much more suited to a Google rival/competitor/adversary/contemporary with similar thinking on Future Presentation Matters and the Manner of ITs AIdDelivery Mechanism.

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/01/20/google_schmidt_bumped_up/

[/blockquote]
http://thedailybell.com/1698/Private-Alternatives-to-Modern-Banking.html
....................................................................................................................................................................

Posted by AmanfromMars on 1/21/2011 11:07:16 AM

"The West, the world's real economic engine, is already close to ruin."

That makes much more sense, DB, perfectly reflecting the present global situation, whenever written ... The West, the world's Ponzi economic engine, is already close to ruin.

And surely you would not choose to disagree, whenever you share, and readers comment on the evidence, which every day provides.

And I think the Chinese are seriously misunderestimated if one thinks that they will follow and pay lip service to any western model which requires wars and military might on foreign soil to sustain it. Creating new and dangerously smart enemies is just plain crazy. And they would be quite right in rejecting it, for it is a certifiable madness to imagine that it is a valid policy instrument in support of a failed currency and society.

Hmmm ... twice times madness is stupid and evil to boot whenever wearing jackboots.

http://thedailybell.com/1701/US-Press-Misfires-Over-China-Disaster.html
.....................................................................................................................................................................

No comments: